-
Website
http://blog.michaelleis.com/ -
Original page
http://blog.michaelleis.com/2008/07/14/are-we-designing-for-community-completely-wrong/ -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
Alan Wolk
1 comment · 2 points
-
jesseluna
1 comment · 1 points
-
yuyudin
4 comments · 1 points
-
neilperkin
1 comment · 2 points
-
Tom OKeefe
1 comment · 1 points
-
-
Popular Threads
Same thinking could and should be applied to video and its emerging microblogging models (seesmic, qik et al).
One way for designers to approach it might be:
How do I illustrate putting the conversation at the heart of this?
I know the Institute for the Future of the Book has experimented with horizontal layouts for content and comments, as seen in their Gamer Theory site: http://www.futureofthebook.org/mckenziewark/
Works for an interactive author/reader experience here, as many of the comments were integrated into the finished published product. Wonder if it would work for other types of media?
-Ryan
I find both to be a bit unusable. We'll have a lot to talk about on Thursday!
Still, the content of the conversations would reside on the blog itself, and I still think there's an issue there. Similar conversations are being had on thousands of blogs across the web. Wouldn't it be better if there was a way to have a larger conversation, get more minds around it? Maybe we need a way to syndicate blog comments to multiple blogs -- tag the comment with the blog where it originated, but create an aggregation across multiple locations on the web. Too hairy? Too impossible?
The creator of ExtJS, Jack Slocum, had a comment system that would allow per-paragraph commenting, but I can't find a working example anymore.
The problem is largely two-fold: figuring out if someone is commenting on a post, and making sure that nth-generation comments can still be tracked back to the origin. Oh, and making sure said system doesn't become Yet Another Spam Vector.
All I can say to both of you is that if you look at the historical trends, there's usually some sort of corporate/technological force that accomplishes this. In the 50's it was Sarnoff creating NBC. In the Internet, we've already seen two waves of syndication of corporate buying/condensing.
Not sure what the future holds socially, but someone will undoubtedly come up with a solution. I think the first may be following Korea's "panelist" model in ecommerce. But who knows? All part of the fun.
From a page-view/adview perspective it's a +1
From an author perspective it's a "you've got to read my article to get to the discussion" +1
For the readers, it *might* make more sense to allow them to "tag" a point in the article that highlights a specific comment (kind of like a tool tip). It could almost be Plurk-like--but the articles might have to be more like Michael's (shorter) and less like mine (the Odyssey).
Just a thought. Good post.
Wow. Bandied. Who knew the king's english would have popped out?
@russ: Well, if we're facing things, we should also face that it may feel more comfortable because it fits with our own habitual sense of read first, react second. But my habits of interaction today are nowhere near the Super Smash Bros. Brawl sensibilities that make up the future of our jobs and the brands we help to anticipate those trends.
Bless you for saying my articles are short. +2